http://www.apltwo.ct.state.az.us/Decisions/cv20070160opn.pdf

There'll be NO living with him NOW.

Wow. I wouldn't want to win if it takes being called a liar to do it.

This is the Almond Joy decision.

I get it. Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't!!!

the title of this thread should be
MacKinnon Loses...Again

A win? That decision reads like the court had to hold their nose to rule against the city. Didn't paint a particularly flattering picture of Harris did it?

Harris didn't win because he was in the right. He only got to keep some of the pages because of a technicality. Can't some of the dumb supporters of that toad read? That was the most stunning indictment of HIS corruption possible without rendering a criminal sentence.

How do those sour grapes taste?

When someone gets described the way Harris was that is the best tasting grapes I've found.

When someone gets described the way Harris was that is the best tasting grapes I've found.
The result is a GOOD thing for the people of Bisbee. We get to vote on theses issues. The fact is 198 valid signatures remain on RF-06-01, and 195 valid signatures remain on RF-06-02 -- more than the 169 required on each petition.

Would it not have been much much simpler if the city
had NOT appealed Hoggatt's decision in the first place?

That way the referendum could have piggybacked
on the ballot last March with the Charter Amendments,
making that election a lot more cost efficient.

There was time and opportunity to put both things on the ballot and the turnout might have been better instead of the record low.

Plus, it would have freed up MacKinnon to tilt at other windmills like the appeal
of the trial court decision on the Border Cities affair.

As it is, the Recorder's office still has to do its check on the signatures.
I understand they were bent out of shape when MacKinnon
held back the paperwork on the first go-round.

The city has one more try in this: Arizona Supreme Court. MacKinnon told the Review that a decision to appeal to that level was up to the council.
So? What's the bet? To the Supreme or to the Electorate?

Loved Shar's article in the paper.