HomeFAQSearchRegisterLog in
Log in
Username:
Password:
Log in automatically: 
:: I forgot my password
Latest topics
» HELP!
Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:34 pm by Guest

» Obama is not the change we wanted
Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:34 am by Guest

» Here we go again
Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:06 am by Guest

» Replacements wanted
Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:14 am by Guest

» Drug tourists in Bisbee
Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:17 am by Guest

» A brave new world?
Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:03 pm by Guest

» Posters names ordered revealed to Judge
Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:22 pm by The Bisbee Avenger

» All's Quiet On The Bisbee Front
Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:48 pm by Guest

» Congratulations to the new President
Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:14 pm by Guest

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
October 2018
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
CalendarCalendar
Social bookmarking
Social bookmarking digg  Social bookmarking delicious  Social bookmarking reddit  Social bookmarking stumbleupon  Social bookmarking slashdot  Social bookmarking yahoo  Social bookmarking google  Social bookmarking blogmarks  Social bookmarking live      

Bookmark and share the address of on your social bookmarking website

Bookmark and share the address of on your social bookmarking website
Top posters
The Bisbee Avenger
 
sandman
 
Jack
 
Elysian
 
sonora
 
Lady Zannah
 
Zasu Pitts
 
Admin
 
Sephiroth
 
Wildfire
 

Share | 
 

 Harris wins

Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
AuthorMessage
user
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:59 pm

Yes. the voters will accept the ordinances.
They did when the last referendum went to a vote. Then as years dragged on the city made changes asked for with THAT referendum.
Yes. Lazy voter's way out. They'll go for it.

UNLESS unless someone tells them what it is they are voting for. Not just a number, a place on the ballot, but an issue that turns out to be illegal after Prop 207.

They will STILL accept and vote YES. But not me........
Back to top Go down
skeptic
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:07 pm

Protecting Jeff's Right To Keep And Bear Chicken Shit And Toxic Computer Waste!
Yeah, THAT'S the ticket.


Why not, you have the right to shit out of your mouth on a regular basis. hammered
Back to top Go down
guest
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:48 pm

Jeff may have won the council vote, but you can kiss his candidacy goodby. Applause
Back to top Go down
the word
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:54 pm

Word on the street is that Harris will get less than 10 per cent of the vote. Perhaps he should stick to petition tampering. He does better at that!
Back to top Go down
Skeptic
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:13 pm

Word on the street is that Harris will get less than 10 per cent of the vote. Perhaps he should stick to petition tampering. He does better at that!
Jeff may be lucky to get that much, but there is no polling in Bisbee, we're all guessing.
Back to top Go down
The Bisbee Avenger

avatar

Number of posts : 375
Quote : "Prepare for a pride-obliterating bitchslap."
Registration date : 2008-01-30

PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:08 pm

skeptic wrote:
Protecting Jeff's Right To Keep And Bear Chicken Shit And Toxic Computer Waste!
Yeah, THAT'S the ticket.


Why not, you have the right to shit out of your mouth on a regular basis. hammered

Of course! To converse with you, I had to become fluent in your native language! lol!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Travesty
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Can you say Counterintuitive?   Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:49 pm

Back to top Go down
C Darrow
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:05 am

Harris won on a technicality. Despite the written laws and the intent of the
legislature to prevent petition tampering including the exclusionary rules
followed by Helen Lehr, the city was ordered to remove ONLY the lines Harris
altered because the affidavit on those petitions was found to be phrased
incorrectly. The wording used on the affidavit was not able to support the law
the legislature passed. Ironically, it was the sample affidavit the legislature
itself provided that was at fault (the sample affidavit was not written by the city
clerk or the city attorney).

The truth is Harris was cited by the court as having altered
those lines and knowingly changing addresses he knew were wrong which is why in
its conclusion the court wrote:

“But this argument was based on the
incorrect assumption that Harris’s affidavit contained the language required by
§19-112C. Had Harris’s affidavit complied with subsection C his alterations as
found by the trial court would have rendered false every affidavit attached to a
signature page containing an alteration, invalidating those signatures. Because
those affidavits did not so comply however Harris’s alterations of the signers’
information outside their presence, although a violation of §19-112A, do not render
the affidavits false, or do not invalidate the unaltered signatures on the
attached signature pages.”
Harris v. City of Bisbee,
et al. 2 CA-CV 2007-0160; page 17, line
24.

Nobody targeted Mr. Harris, no one tried to entrap him and no vendetta was at work. Helen Lehr and the city only attempted to follow the direction of the legislature.
Back to top Go down
Verdad
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:29 pm

Upson is right in one context, who authored the affidavit doesn't matter. There is no indication that either side set out to capitalize on anyone's errors. I don't know where he gets that. The issue of the affidavit was only mentioned to respond to those who incorrectly blamed MacKinnon or the city for it. ARS and the law prior to this case required THAT affidavit to be used.

The simple fact is Harris did something questionable by anyone's standards. The only logical reason was to ensure that his petitions had the necessary number of valid signatures to take it to the voters; but don't dissemble the facts, he didn't do it for the people (the people would also prefer not to have their petitions tampered with), he did it for himself and his chickens.
A true hero of the people, right up there with Tyson Foods.
Back to top Go down
Admin
Admin
avatar

Number of posts : 25
Registration date : 2008-01-18

PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:31 pm

Posting personal e-mail is a violation of TOS. Please refrain from that unless permission of the sender has been obtained and noted on the post.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://bisbeepolitics.darkbb.com
guest
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:58 pm

That was an interesting e-mail!!!
Back to top Go down
WTF
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: conditional affirmation?   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:02 pm

Can someone please explain "conditional affirmation" in nice simple terms?
Back to top Go down
Niolete
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:02 pm

I had to read it several times. Was that real? Was he actually that paranoid as to think the city was going to arrest him and did anyone else read that as conspiring to commit perjury?
Back to top Go down
Niolete
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:05 pm

Conditional affirmation means how can I commit perjury and get away with it.
Back to top Go down
guest
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:10 pm

That E-mail was an eye-opener.
Back to top Go down
WTF
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Perjury?   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:15 pm

Anyone else notice a pattern of very strange behaviour here? conspiracy theory
Back to top Go down
Niolete
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:19 pm

Strange behavior indeed!
Back to top Go down
strange
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:21 pm

Wonder where that e-mail came from?
Back to top Go down
TOM TOM
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Somebody fill me in   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:22 pm

Ok, I missed it. What went down?
Back to top Go down
strange
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:24 pm

One of the more informative nights here in the B. Wonder if someone is Ranting ?
Back to top Go down
Niolete
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:27 pm

You missed it TOM TOM. Somebody stuck in an email by Harris that was unbelievable. I'll send you a screen print, pm your email address to me.
Back to top Go down
TOM TOM
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:36 pm

I can't PM here?!?
Back to top Go down
Niolete
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:37 pm

Drat. go to yahoo, I'll file it there
Back to top Go down
TOM TOM
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:42 pm

Thanks and OMG!!!
Back to top Go down
TOM TOM
Guest
avatar


PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:01 pm

Who the heck has those email? If it had been Eric he would have thrown that stuff out before the decision.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Harris wins   

Back to top Go down
 
Harris wins
Back to top 
Page 2 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Owen the monster wins appeal
» Lord Toby Harris
» Call Ed Harris Tax Lawyer at McInnes-Cooper for all your tax questions Tel: 902.444.8479 Fax: 902.425.6350
» 22-Month-Old Cooper Harris' Death Investigation -- Justin Ross Harris Charged With Felony Murder in Son's Heat Related Death -- Cobb County, GA
» Sharon Shoesmith Wins Baby P Sacking Appeal

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: Bisbee Issues-
Jump to: