Democratic Dynamite

Guest

The party is tearing itself apart as HILBILL battle to regain control of the white house against the clearly preferred candidate. Obama is trying to be patient but the longer this goes on the more likely we are handing the election back to the repugs. on a soapbox

Subject: Re: Democratic Dynamite Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:14 pm

Nitro wrote:: The party is tearing itself apart as HILBILL battle to regain control of the white house against the clearly preferred candidate. Obama is trying to be patient but the longer this goes on the more likely we are handing the election back to the repugs.

I try not to be insulting and demeaning to Democrats because I think most of them are good people who mean well, but are misguided.

With that in mind, what do you mean by "repugs"???

Guest

Face it folks. This is the most different primary season we have ever confronted.

Let's wait and see?

Guest

Repug = pugnacious
Repug = repugnant
Repug = repugnican

As a Republican, I am pleased with this tidbit, because Hillary is saying that Obama can't beat McCain, but SHE can't beat Obama! Just like Algore in 2000, Democrats are snatching defeat from the jaws of certain victory!

April 02, 2008 7:39 PM

ABC News' George Stephanopoulos Reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and former President Bill Clinton are making very direct arguments to Democratic superdelegates, starkly insisting Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., cannot win a general election against presumptive Republican nominee, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

Sources with direct knowledge of the conversation between Sen. Clinton and Gov. Bill Richardson, D-N.M., prior to the Governor's endorsement of Obama say she told him flatly, "He cannot win, Bill. He cannot win."

To read the entire article, click the link: Candidate Clinton to Richardson: 'Barack Obama Can't Win'

Subject: Re: Democratic Dynamite Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:57 pm

Nitro wrote:: Repug = pugnacious
Repug = repugnant
Repug = repugnican

And exactly WHO are the people you are saying are described by these bigoted definitions? All persons who are registered Republicans?

Guest

Can you think of a better definition of corporate crooks that repubs?

The rape the environment, the country and the world.

Subject: Re: Democratic Dynamite Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:07 pm

Nitro wrote:: Can you think of a better definition of corporate crooks that repubs?

The rape the environment, the country and the world.

Rape, eh? Pretty strong language there. Are you saying that all Republicans are rapists?

Guest

In the right circumstance **unhindered and unregulated** they are exactly that. Just look at the economy. We are in debt to the Chinese. They won't need to attack us. They can simply foreclose on us.

Subject: Re: Democratic Dynamite Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:12 pm

Nitro wrote:: In the right circumstance **unhindered and unregulated** they are exactly that. Just look at the economy. We are in debt to the Chinese. They won't need to attack us. They can simply foreclose on us.

I'm not sure how I can have a productive conversation with someone who apparently assumes that all persons who belong to a certain political party are all alike.

Guest

The problem is that the rank and file refuse to see that there is a **core** in that party that is totally dedicated to making as much money as possible. They are greedy and don't give a damn for the alleged values of the party_simply their own values_ and those are to manipulate the world in an effort to increase the wealth that is localized in a few multinational corporations.

Subject: Re: Democratic Dynamite Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:21 pm

Nitro wrote:: The problem is that the rank and file refuse to see that there is a **core** in that party that is totally dedicated to making as much money as possible. They are greedy and don't give a damn for the alleged values of the party_simply their own values_ and those are to manipulate the world in an effort to increase the wealth that is localized in a few multinational corporations.

Please define "greedy." Your definition doesn't happen to mean "wanting more wealth than Nitro deems proper", does it?

Guest

Just how much wealth does anyone need??
Seems to me that most of the world thinks that there is a point when wealth becomes obscene.

Subject: Re: Democratic Dynamite Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:34 pm

Nitro wrote:: Just how much wealth does anyone need??
Seems to me that most of the world thinks that there is a point when wealth becomes obscene.

But who gets to decide where that point is? You?

Subject: Re: Democratic Dynamite Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:03 am

Eric, the tangentially-responsive question is NOT the Socratic method. Instead of that, discussion might be better served were you to actually respond to the assertions made by Nitro -- even with contradictory assertions. At least then, you two could struggle over something, rather than fire warning shots past each other's sterns.

Poor Nitro's doing the best he can, putting all those positions out there. . . and all you're doing is picking at hangnails.

Guest

» Who will win the Democratic Nomination