Background Investigations

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:22 pm

Pauken was really cool to come in here and post. thumbs up

.

Guest

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:37 pm

Maybe those strange people will stay at that other forum, and let the serious and fun discussions take place here. Perhaps those strange ones on those other forums can make an appointed to visit that t.v. show Jerry Springer

.

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:34 pm

Steve,
We were so glad to have you come by and answer that question. Thank you so much.

Guest

You are a hypocrite. There have been posts hinting at a certain proclivity for chickens by JH. Also I assume profanity IS allowed, I've seen it here - the "F" word to be exact.
I realize it's your sandbox...

Admin Number of posts : 25 Registration date : 2008-01-18

Skeptic wrote:: You are a hypocrite. There have been posts hinting at a certain proclivity for chickens by JH. Also I assume profanity IS allowed, I've seen it here - the "F" word to be exact.
I realize it's your sandbox...

I appreciate your confusion. I think you will be fine if you simply avoid that subject.

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:31 pm

Skeptic wrote:: You are a hypocrite. There have been posts hinting at a certain proclivity for chickens by JH. Also I assume profanity IS allowed, I've seen it here - the "F" word to be exact.
I realize it's your sandbox...

It sounds like your SOLE purpose is to embarrass & humiliate over old news; over questions that have been ASKED and ANSWERED ad-infinitum.

The questions for Jeff remain, to this very day, unanswered.

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:36 pm

I'm afraid the strange ones are going to invade this forum, and take all the fun away. Eeew

.

Guest

So it is OK to accuse JH of sodomizing chickens??

Admin Number of posts : 25 Registration date : 2008-01-18

Skeptic wrote:: So it is OK to accuse JH of sodomizing chickens??

As far as I know, it is physically impossible for that to happen. It is sarcasm. What you were mentioning was not. You'll be fine, just avoid that subject.

Guest

Walks away shaking his head.

This is the home of the double standard. Have fun pleasuring each other!

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:59 pm

What's wrong with this skeptic person, sounds like this person doesn't like to have fun. hammered

.

Guest

I am having fun, you'll understand when you hit puberty.

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:06 pm

I thought this skeptic person had walked away, now it's back again Anti trolling

Guest

Gee and I thought Snora/Eric had left.

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:18 pm

yeah skeptic you have some humor in you{snora} .

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:43 pm

sonora wrote:: yeah skeptic you have some humor in you{snora} .

Those born without a funnybone have a hard time grasping humor.
LOL

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:49 pm

My guess it will be difficult for skeptic to have some fun. That person just has to much of a Ranting

imbedded in their brain.

Guest

Number of posts : 71 Registration date : 2008-02-03

The Bisbee Avenger wrote:

sonora wrote:: yeah skeptic you have some humor in you{snora} .

Those born without a funnybone have a hard time grasping humor.
LOL

Lady Zannah thinks Skeptic is too preoccupied with his 'wishbone' to see the humor in anything.

Guest

Actually I've gotten quite a few laughs here. Perhaps Eric and his many posting ID's are a little too sensitive. There is a double standard here, but hey, it's all good.

Subject: Re: Background Investigations Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:03 pm

Skeptic wrote:: Actually I've gotten quite a few laughs here. Perhaps Eric and his many posting ID's are a little too sensitive. There is a double standard here, but hey, it's all good.

OK, Jeff, I'll bite! Besides The Bisbee Avenger, who ELSE have you determined that, through a rigorous analysis of the evidence, I am supposedly posting as here?

(And did you learn this apparent SWAG method of evaluation in grad school?) short bus

Admin Number of posts : 25 Registration date : 2008-01-18

Two complaints have now been lodged regarding offensive posts. The original in this thread and one referenced in this thread but posted in another. On review the latter post has also been removed as well as any reference to it.
As is noted in the registration agreement, not every post is capable of being reviewed and unless complaints are filed, many that could be construed as offensive can be overlooked. It is the intention of this forum to allow political discussion with as little intrusion as possible. Thank you.

Guest

I'm not JH Eric. You apparently see JH around every corner - BOO!!!
LOL!

Guest

Admin wrote:: Two complaints have now been lodged regarding offensive posts. The original in this thread and one referenced in this thread but posted in another. On review the latter post has also been removed as well as any reference to it.
As is noted in the registration agreement, not every post is capable of being reviewed and unless complaints are filed, many that could be construed as offensive can be overlooked. It is the intention of this forum to allow political discussion with as little intrusion as possible. Thank you.

What do you mean "Construed as offensive"? Haven't you seen some or most of the postings about Harris? They border on slander or libel...