TOXIC DANGER???

The Toxic Offender is appearing on Topix, using his multiple
personaltities to tempt the wayward into a response to his latest gossip fueled agenda. Although everyone now has his number and isn't
responding he doesn't stop; enforcing the previous analogy that he is the
toilet paper on everyone's shoes. His psychophrenic monologue between
his anonymous identities is stylistically reminicent of so many others that we have slowly learned do not exist. The
revelation that there has possibly been ONLY one pathetic irritant may
still be hard to understand but as we watch this social defiant we
recognize the similarities of diction previously credited to soo many others. The old Manic Mangler and his
sociopathic personality no longer entertains or even mystifies; the unmasking
simply underscores his
unending repitoire of personal agendas. The question is whether there is any danger beyond a toxic yard and toxic mind?

Evidently the toxic TOPIX truss is attracting his own responses and admiring himself too. Poor pooper paper.

I think I have hurt someting. I am laughing myself silly at the thought of anyone but the toxic toilet roll would call himself cute. Does he actually think women would think a balding falsetto is cute. HA HA HA HA HA

I can't quite decide what to write, about Jeff and toilet paper!

My mind is aglow with whirling, transient nodes of thought careening through a cosmic vapor of invention! It's a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought, cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives!

I'll get right on it. Tomorrow.

The Bisbee Avenger wrote:

I can't quite decide what to write, about Jeff and toilet paper!

My
mind is aglow with whirling, transient nodes of thought careening
through a cosmic vapor of invention! It's a raging torrent, flooded
with rivulets of thought, cascading into a waterfall of creative
alternatives!

I'll get right on it. Tomorrow.

Hedley is that you??

Remember the old fart that lived somewhere in every neighborhood;
terrorizing kids who strayed into his yard? The old codger who wrote
endless letters to the editor criticizing local government, convinced
that the the communists were living next door and sure that the local
merchants had conspired to shortchange him or were in league to prevent
his car from running? Think back, he was skinny, lived alone, and had
an age roughtly between 50 and 112 (or was it that he just seemed to
live that long)? He always wore a scowl. He never went to any social functions, except the
occassional Veterans Day Parade, he NEVER gave out Halloween candy. He
preferred to spy on his neighbors through venetian blinds and ogle at
young girls from the anonymity of his porch. Your parents would tell you to leave him alone or not to go near him. He would call your parents and lie claiming he saw you stealing his apples, when you were no where nearby. He was the iconic neighborhood crackpot. The
man so mean even his own family never came to visit. He has only changed
slightly, he is still skinny, still nasty and unpleasant, still
convinced of the
existence of conspiracies and still willing to lie to get some attention; but instead of cats, he keeps chickens;
instead of hoarding old newspapers he hoards old computers, instead of spying from behind venetian blinds, he hides behind the anonymity of psuedo identities. Now he prefers to lurke in chatrooms and forums, rather than endless letters to the editor, or calling your parents, he spreds his version of geriatric ghastlies in online
neighborhoods where he can enjoy a much wider audience and a lot more attention.

It appears that "you know who" and his buddies are going rabid over on (whisper) that other forum attacking poor Jack. Well, we knew it was only a matter of time before he was vilified.

Nobody dares to disagree with that group and not suffer the consequences. I don't know why Jack bothers. It is a nasty group that will do nothing but attack him. Come home Jack, you're welcome here, in spite of what they say.

Elysian wrote:

It appears that "you know who" and his buddies are going rabid over on (whisper) that other forum attacking poor Jack. Well, we knew it was only a matter of time before he was vilified.

Nobody dares to disagree with that group and not suffer the consequences. I don't know why Jack bothers. It is a nasty group that will do nothing but attack him. Come home Jack, you're welcome here, in spite of what they say.

You really think it was HWSNBN? I sorta do, too. In any case, between my answer and the origination of a thread on their new "Judge It!" nonsense, I think that if it was HWSNBN, he'll now feel compelled to engage in sufficient interplay so that we can all get a giggle or two.

When I first read your post here, I hadn't seen the one there; you kinda confused me, since there had been almost no action over there for most of two days. Apparently HWSNBN misinterpreted a comment I made about the lack of action as a gripe about off-topic posts -- me, of all people, who can go off-topic with the best of 'em! (Besides, they can't stay ON-topic over there.)

At any rate: Fun, Fun, Fun.

Jack wrote:

Elysian wrote:

It appears that "you know who" and his buddies are going rabid over on (whisper) that other forum attacking poor Jack. Well, we knew it was only a matter of time before he was vilified.

Nobody dares to disagree with that group and not suffer the consequences. I don't know why Jack bothers. It is a nasty group that will do nothing but attack him. Come home Jack, you're welcome here, in spite of what they say.

You really think it was HWSNBN? I sorta do, too. In any case, between my answer and the origination of a thread on their new "Judge It!" nonsense, I think that if it was HWSNBN, he'll now feel compelled to engage in sufficient interplay so that we can all get a giggle or two.

When I first read your post here, I hadn't seen the one there; you kinda confused me, since there had been almost no action over there for most of two days. Apparently HWSNBN misinterpreted a comment I made about the lack of action as a gripe about off-topic posts -- me, of all people, who can go off-topic with the best of 'em! (Besides, they can't stay ON-topic over there.)

At any rate: Fun, Fun, Fun.

None of us are clairvoyant so there is no way to be absolutely sure, but I suspect we are correct in our estimation as to those behind most skidmark posts on TOPIX. (I have it on good authority that JH is very angry and enlisting the aid of his more virulent chums, it appears the more balanced of his former clique have indeed tried to distance themselves.) My personal opinion is that the current group represents the core of the disenfranchised and antisocial. They do not like humor, because it is so adept at exposing disfunction. You sir, committed an unforgivable offence, you exposed their personal agendas. For the last several years the victims of their abuse have been those in or somehow connected to city government ; simply because those who personally offended them were involved with it. They have no true interest in the betterment of Bisbee, only in the destruction of those they have categorized as their enemies. ( which can amount to those merely unappreciative of their friendship or dismissive of their brilliance) That in a nutshell is the agenda behind everything they do. Once it becomes obvious, it makes it harder for them to successfully create dissension, half truths and innuendo. To block this secret from the more astute they must utilize anonymity. It allows it to appear they have a broader base of support for their views; it shields their personal agendas; AND it lets them attack anyone (even friends) who veer from their personal agendas. That is why even on Elliot's forum they still wanted to be able to post anonymously.

The common thread behind all their attacks point to four failings; they don't like facts, questions, the humorous, or the free thinking.

As my old and unsainted Daddy used to say: "T-U-double UFF". I'm a firm believer in the Twain & Bierce school of political commentary: "Skewer the barstids." Besides, politics is inherently a funny hobby, and deserves to be lampooned. . . and fanaticism makes it even more deserving.

HA HA HA. These fools wouldn't know a joke if they fell over it.

Do we have a good guess as to the players in this drama? Who is SStain if not a guise of Harris?

Don't underestimate his ability to be versatile. I think he intentionally changes his approach to a post, using misspelling when it suits him and trying to sound like people with other political views. Who knows though. Maybe it is the fact that anybody who would doctor petitions would not find it a stretch to present himself under many guises.

With apologies in advance for the cross-post: "There seems to be some confusion about the true identity of SStain. Don't be confused, folks: The real, the true, the one and only SStain is NOT our beloved petitioner!

"While our petitioner also masquerades under a bewildering cover of anonymous names, his posts lack the sublime stupidity of the real SStain, and must make do with a semi-literate peevishness.


"For further information and distinguishing characteristics, please refer to the "Identifying Skidmark Posts" thread. Remember: There is no substitute for the glaring idiocy of the actual SStain --- mere aggrieved commentary is not the real thing, but only a pale imitation. While The Petitioner has petulance, do NOT settle for less than the compendium of incompetence which is the genuine SStain."

I grant The Petitioner some skill at phony names and desultory disguise, but -- by and large -- his 'serious' approach gives him away, just as does the blatantly idiotic posting of Sonny "SStain" Houston.While The Petitioner has some wish that others take him at least somewhat seriously, SStain just flat doesn't give a damn what anybody thinks. . . including himself, 'cause it'll change in the next few minutes.

A side observation here: The Avenger's observation about conversation and 'jumps' is right on target!

The person trying to keep a conversation tightly-focused on his own narrow choice of topic is -- simply and utterly -- a control freak. As often as I've been accused of that, I understand the syndrome! Actual, real conversation does in fact drift; if we're lucky, it eventually drifts full circle. . . but maybe not. If you're talking with other people, go where the conversation takes you; otherwise, you're Hillary Clinton!

Or The Petitioner. Of course, you then run the risk of being considered obsessed.

I think Jack and Eric both have it right. Sound like the guys have his number.

Travesty wrote:

You have outdone yourself with this one.

Actually this shows how the chickens on Erie were smuggled into the city.

the c hickens on Yum a Trail are ALSO in the city/

What am I missing here? ?????? ...... _____ ?????

Yo Sammy----What you're missing is a joke.