Bisbee censorship

[b]Lady Zannah pleasures in "neutralizing" Toxic Offenders.

Good hunting Lady Zannah!!

This is a pleasant and very fun place to be. The humor keeps me smiling!! It's upbeat and even when critical has enough tongue in cheek humor to make it unoffensive. It is a breath of fresh air.

Well this forum is better than the others anyway .

Winter wrote:

[b] Another Thread involving the topic of Jeff Harris has just bit the dust over on Topix . What I don't understand is how that guy continually gets the threads removed by the Moderator. And, why he always WANTS threads removed that contain his name? I don't think he is trying to hide anything

The answer: It is far easier than you would imagine, all you need to do is ask.

I suppose Harris is not dumb, but I think that he is given more credit than he deserves. He may come off as intelligent in a few areas, but I don't think he is an all around intelligent guy. People who are truly intelligent ask questions, they admit they do not know it all and then learn, learn, learn . Harris thinks he knows it all and he doesn't. That is going to be his downfall. Has anyone noticed that if he does not know something or is unsure, he simply yells and browbeats . Now for the 50 million dollar question: IS HE EDUCATED AND WHAT IS HIS EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND?

I don't think Harris "intends" to be such a bad guy... Ya just gotta take him with a grain of salt
Morton's is up 17 points these past 2 weeks....

.... of course, I also hear that Lady Zannah has switched to Margharitas'

Tim Tim wrote:

I don't think Harris "intends" to be such a bad guy... Ya just gotta take him with a grain of salt
Morton's is up 17 points these past 2 weeks....

Would that be garlic salt?

The only thing that can explain the constant search for the non existent needle is paranoia and apparently that paranoia is contagious because at least 20 people are known to have the same affliction. Apparently cross contamination is to blame. Each throws their paranoid ideas to the other for enforcement and validation.

In response to the post on paranoia, I agree on all except one observation. I do not see 20 people standing up and defending Jeff Harris and his beliefs. I think that years ago there were some people who bought into Jeff Harris' rationalizations about corruption in the government and the need for the recalling of Council. I think many of those people haveremoved themselves from Jeff Harris and his platforms.

I challenge all of you YES ALL OF YOU to contribut to a thread any thread WITHOUT MENTIONING JEFF HARRIS.

Go for it. You're on.

My Lady, it is bad form to so quickly catch the double standard of a guest. We should welcome him and make him laugh FIRST.

My Lady, How were you able to find that many threads about EF by Jack or LUCIFER?

challenge all of you YES ALL OF YOU to contribut to a thread any thread WITHOUT MENTIONING JEFF HARRIS.

Go for it. You're on.

My question to Alpha--why?

Alpha wrote:

I challenge all of you YES ALL OF YOU to contribut to a thread any thread WITHOUT MENTIONING JEFF HARRIS.

Go for it. You're on.

(I just don't want to!)

Given the intense scrutiny that was given to Mr Fahrner by those who didn't like anything he had to say, it's a bit incongruous for them to now be concerned about people talking about them. Oh well, an ability to see a double standard at work was never their strong suit.

Evidently they are blind, someone has alluded to the comments regarding Mr. Harris laying down a bet that the subject could be avoided on another thread. Is this the first time they've noticed?

The unmentionable one is more and more becoming known as a cranky eccentric. Very few people are taking the nameless one seriously, especially after the comments that we should get rid of the street department.